GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Quadro M1000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost will be the best choice, for others Quadro M1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro M1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
40 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB/4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 235% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 13 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 4994 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than Quadro M1000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
24−27
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
55−60
50−55
medium / 1080p
30−33
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
210−220
210−220
medium / 768p
180−190
180−190
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−105
QHD / 1440p
60−65
50−55
4K / 2160p
30−35
30−33
high / 768p
150−160
140−150
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
95−100
ultra / 1080p
70−75
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Quadro M1000M.
high / 1080p
20−22
18−20
ultra / 1080p
18−20
16−18
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
40−45
medium / 1080p
21−24
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than Quadro M1000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
24−27
ultra / 1080p
21−24
20−22
QHD / 1440p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
100−110
medium / 1080p
60−65
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 4% more, than Quadro M1000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
24−27
ultra / 1080p
21−24
20−22
QHD / 1440p
10−11
9−10
low / 720p
55−60
50−55
medium / 1080p
30−35
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
80−85
75−80
high / 1080p
30−35
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Quadro M1000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
30−33
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro M1000M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
60−65
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro M1000M
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GK106
GM107
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
2 October 2015
Pipelines
768
512
Core clock speed
980 MHz
993 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1072 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
31.78
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
1,017 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.22 kh/s
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
140 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
