GRID K140Q vs Quadro M1000M
In this comparison between GRID K140Q and Quadro M1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K140Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K140Q
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Quadro M1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 225% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M1000M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 143 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q and Quadro M1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 3218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 138% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 254% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 471% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 135% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 112% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2700% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1800% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Quadro M1000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK107 | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 31.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |