GRID K220Q vs Quadro M1000M
In this comparison between GRID K220Q and Quadro M1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro M1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB/4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 462% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 248 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GRID K220Q and Quadro M1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q and Quadro M1000M is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 385% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 117% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 111% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 220% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 660% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 68% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro M1000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK104 | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 31.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |