GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro M1000M
In this comparison between GRID M60 8Q and Quadro M1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 8Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro M1000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 40 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 462% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 436 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q and Quadro M1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 12 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 22% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 23% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 26% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GRID M60 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro M1000M | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GM204 | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 993 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 31.78 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |