HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro M1000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between HD Graphics 630 and Quadro M1000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the HD Graphics 630 stacks up against Quadro M1000M, check out specs charts below.
HD Graphics 630
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M1000M has 166% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 62 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- HD Graphics 630 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 693 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 220% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| HD Graphics 630 and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 72% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 131% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 225% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 64% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Maxwell |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2017 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1072 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 31.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |