Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro M1000M
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M1000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M1000M.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M1000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M1000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro M1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
40 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
eDRAM
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
2 GB/4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 12% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 793 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro M1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
14−16
ultra / 1080p
5−6
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
30−35
50−55
medium / 1080p
16−18
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
210−220
medium / 768p
130−140
180−190
ultra / 1080p
65−70
100−105
QHD / 1440p
35−40
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
100−110
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
70−75
95−100
ultra / 1080p
40−45
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
10−12
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
16−18
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
100−110
medium / 1080p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
20−22
QHD / 1440p
3−4
9−10
low / 720p
30−35
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
75−80
high / 1080p
18−20
30−35
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−11
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
30−33
medium / 1080p
8−9
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
27−30
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
30−35
55−60
medium / 768p
21−24
35−40
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
4K / 2160p
7−8
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
high / 768p
40−45
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro M1000M
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Maxwell
Code name
Haswell GT3e
GM107
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
2 October 2015
Pipelines
40
512
Core clock speed
200 MHz
993 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1072 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
31.78
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
1,017 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.22 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
140 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price