Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro M1000M
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M1000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M1000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro M1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
40 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB/4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M1000M has 166% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 693 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
16−18
50−55
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
85−90
180−190
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−105
QHD / 1440p
24−27
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
60−65
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
95−100
ultra / 1080p
24−27
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
16−18
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
6−7
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 131% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
low / 720p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
10−11
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 169% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
85−90
medium / 768p
35−40
75−80
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−11
ultra / 1080p
2−3
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
8−9
30−33
medium / 1080p
5−6
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 72% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
55−60
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
7−8
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro M1000M
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Maxwell
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
GM107
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
2 October 2015
Pipelines
48
512
Core clock speed
300 MHz
993 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1072 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
31.78
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
1,017 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.22 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
140 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
