Quadro CX vs Quadro M1000M
When comparing Quadro CX and Quadro M1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro CX and Quadro M1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro CX
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro CX | Quadro M1000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 40 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB/4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 275% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 391 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 385% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 117% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 220% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Quadro CX | Quadro M1000M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GT200B | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 993 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 31.78 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 1.3 | 5.0 |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro M1000M vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro M1000M vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 680M
- Quadro CX vs GeForce MX350
- Quadro M1000M vs GeForce GTX 680M
- Quadro M1000M vs GeForce MX350