Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro M1000M
When comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro M1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro M1000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 40 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 170% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M1000M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 393 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 800% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 239% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 215% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 3000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 93% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro M1000M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GT200B | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 993 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 31.78 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 1.3 | 5.0 |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |