Quadro M1000M vs Radeon Pro 570
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M1000M and Radeon Pro 570, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M1000M stacks up against Radeon Pro 570, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro 570
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M1000M | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB/4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 570 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 570 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 570 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro 570 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 570 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 7 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 570 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 1780 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 125% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Far Cry 5 is 123% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Fortnite is 97% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 138% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Quadro M1000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro M1000M | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 20 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 512 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | 1105 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 | 123.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 3,584 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6780 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |