Quadro M1000M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
In this comparison between Quadro M1000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M1000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M1000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro M1000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M1000M
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
40 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB/4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 87% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
Quadro M1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro M1000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
Quadro M1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 2600 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
14−16
QHD / 1440p
4−5
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 56% more, than Quadro M1000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
QHD / 1440p
8−9
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
10−11
low / 720p
50−55
75−80
medium / 1080p
27−30
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
210−220
240−250
medium / 768p
180−190
210−220
ultra / 1080p
100−105
130−140
QHD / 1440p
50−55
100−110
4K / 2160p
30−33
60−65
high / 768p
140−150
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
110−120
ultra / 1080p
65−70
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 17% more, than Quadro M1000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
30−33
ultra / 1080p
16−18
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
low / 720p
40−45
60−65
medium / 1080p
20−22
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 52% more, than Quadro M1000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
20−22
30−33
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
low / 720p
100−110
130−140
medium / 1080p
50−55
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 38% more, than Quadro M1000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
40−45
ultra / 1080p
20−22
30−35
QHD / 1440p
9−10
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
75−80
medium / 1080p
27−30
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 59% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
75−80
100−110
high / 1080p
30−35
45−50
ultra / 1080p
12−14
20−22
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than Quadro M1000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
30−33
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 53% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro M1000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
80−85
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Quadro M1000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 52% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
55−60
85−90
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
high / 1080p
18−20
30−33
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
4K / 2160p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than Quadro M1000M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro M1000M.
Full Specs
Quadro M1000M
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Maxwell
Vega
Code name
GM107
Vega Mobile
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
15 November 2018
Pipelines
512
1024
Core clock speed
993 MHz
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
1190 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
31.78
76.16
Floating-point performance
1,017 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
6.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
5.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.22 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
140 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
