Quadro M1000M vs Tesla M6
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M1000M and Tesla M6, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M1000M stacks up against Tesla M6, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M6
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M1000M | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB/4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 63 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- Quadro M1000M and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 12 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 143% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 160% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 142% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 113% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 155% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 169% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 135% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M1000M | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.78 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |