Quadro M1000M vs Tesla M60
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M1000M and Tesla M60. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M1000M and Tesla M60. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M60
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M1000M | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB/4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 436 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro M1000M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 12 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 137% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 152% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 138% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 106% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 97% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 153% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 123% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 146% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M1000M | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.78 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |