FirePro W5100 vs Quadro M1200
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and Quadro M1200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and Quadro M1200.
FirePro W5100
Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1200 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Quadro M1200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 has 11% more power consumption, than Quadro M1200.
- FirePro W5100 and Quadro M1200 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M1200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 61 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 and Quadro M1200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro M1200.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Fortnite is 11% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Quadro M1200 | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Bonaire | N17P-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 991 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |