GeForce GT 745A vs Quadro M1200
In this comparison between GeForce GT 745A and Quadro M1200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 745A will be the best choice, for others Quadro M1200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 745A
Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 745A | Quadro M1200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M1200 has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 745A.
- Quadro M1200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GT 745A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M1200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 154 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A and Quadro M1200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 745A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 745A and Quadro M1200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 134% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Dota 2 is 98% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Far Cry 5 is 380% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Fortnite is 194% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 290% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 136% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Minecraft is 40% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 214% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 745A | Quadro M1200 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK107 | N17P-Q1 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 August 2013 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 991 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 915 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.28 | |
| Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 26 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |