GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M1200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro M1200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Quadro M1200, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro M1200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 233% more power consumption, than Quadro M1200.
- Quadro M1200 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M1200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 309 MHz higher, than Quadro M1200.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M1200 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 3300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Dota 2 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Fortnite is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro M1200 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
Code name | GF104 | N17P-Q1 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 288 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 991 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1870 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |