GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro M1200
When comparing GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro M1200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro M1200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro M1200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 22% more power consumption, than Quadro M1200.
- Quadro M1200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M1200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 363 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro M1200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Fortnite is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro M1200 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK106 | N17P-Q1 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 991 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |