Quadro M1200 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between Quadro M1200 and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M1200 and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M1200 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro M1200.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M1200.
- Quadro M1200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 417 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Quadro M1200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Fortnite is 138% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M1200 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | N17P-Q1 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 991 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |