FirePro V5800 vs Quadro M2000

In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and Quadro M2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V5800

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V5800	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	74 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Quadro M2000 has 1% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M2000 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 106 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000 - by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro V5800 is 28 mm longer, than Quadro M2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 2612 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	16−18	40−45
medium / 1080p	7−8	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 212% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	30−35
ultra / 1080p	9−10	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−12	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	130−140	230−240
medium / 768p	100−110	200−210
ultra / 1080p	50−55	120−130
QHD / 1440p	27−30	90−95
4K / 2160p	27−30	50−55
high / 768p	75−80	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 107% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	3−4	8−9
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	14−16	30−35
ultra / 1080p	10−11	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	120−130
medium / 1080p	21−24	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 142% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−11	27−30
QHD / 1440p	1−2	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	24−27	70−75
medium / 1080p	12−14	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	50−55	100−110
medium / 768p	40−45	95−100
high / 1080p	10−12	40−45
ultra / 1080p	6−7	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	4−5	12−14
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	10−12	40−45
medium / 1080p	6−7	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	70−75
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−12	40−45
medium / 1080p	10−11	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 177% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	21−24	75−80
medium / 768p	16−18	45−50
high / 1080p	9−10	24−27
ultra / 1080p	6−7	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 215% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
high / 768p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 36% more, than FirePro V5800.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5800	Quadro M2000
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Juniper	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	26 April 2010	8 April 2016
Pipelines	800	768
Core clock speed	690 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	1,040 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	27.60	55.82
Floating-point performance	1,104.0 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length	229 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA		5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
		Check Price

FirePro V5800 vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares