FirePro V5900 vs Quadro M2000

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5900 and Quadro M2000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5900 stacks up against Quadro M2000, check out specs charts below.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 196 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000 - by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro V5900 is 29 mm longer, than Quadro M2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 4612 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	14−16	40−45
medium / 1080p	7−8	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	8−9	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−12	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	130−140	230−240
medium / 768p	100−110	200−210
ultra / 1080p	50−55	120−130
QHD / 1440p	24−27	90−95
4K / 2160p	12−14	50−55
high / 768p	75−80	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 82% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	8−9
low / 720p	16−18	50−55
medium / 1080p	7−8	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 237% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	7−8	30−35
ultra / 1080p	0−1	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	120−130
medium / 1080p	18−20	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 171% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	8−9	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	70−75
medium / 1080p	12−14	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 215% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	10−11	40−45
ultra / 1080p	4−5	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	7−8
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	12−14
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	10−11	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 35% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	70−75
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 169% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	40−45
medium / 1080p	9−10	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	20−22	75−80
medium / 768p	12−14	45−50
high / 1080p	6−7	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	3−4	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 277% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro M2000
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Cayman	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	8 April 2016
Pipelines	512	768
Core clock speed	600 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	55.82
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length	230 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA		5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s	215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares