FirePro V7900 vs Quadro M2000

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V7900 and Quadro M2000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V7900 stacks up against Quadro M2000, check out specs charts below.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 has 101% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V7900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 71 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000 - by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro V7900 is 78 mm longer, than Quadro M2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 1612 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	21−24
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	24−27	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
QHD / 1440p	1−2	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	35−40	65−70
medium / 1080p	20−22	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	180−190	230−240
medium / 768p	150−160	200−210
ultra / 1080p	75−80	120−130
QHD / 1440p	45−50	90−95
4K / 2160p	30−33	50−55
high / 768p	110−120	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−33	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	120−130
medium / 768p	80−85	100−110
ultra / 1080p	50−55	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	8−9
low / 720p	30−33	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	80−85	120−130
medium / 1080p	35−40	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 61% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
QHD / 1440p	5−6	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	70−75
medium / 1080p	21−24	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 95% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	95−100
high / 1080p	21−24	40−45
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 88% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	70−75
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 64% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	40−45	75−80
medium / 768p	24−27	45−50
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	8−9	14−16
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 78% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	40−45
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	Quadro M2000
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Cayman	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	8 April 2016
Pipelines	1280	768
Core clock speed	725 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	55.82
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length	279 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA		5.2
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s	215 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares