FirePro W600 vs Quadro M2000

When comparing FirePro W600 and Quadro M2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W600 and Quadro M2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro W600 Check Price

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W600	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W600.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W600 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 46 MHz higher, than FirePro W600.
FirePro W600 and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M2000 is 38 mm longer, than FirePro W600.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 2612 MHz higher, than FirePro W600.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	8−9	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	10−11	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	14−16	30−35
ultra / 1080p	12−14	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 141% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	150−160	230−240
medium / 768p	120−130	200−210
ultra / 1080p	60−65	120−130
QHD / 1440p	30−35	90−95
4K / 2160p	27−30	50−55
high / 768p	90−95	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 79% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
medium / 768p	65−70	100−110
ultra / 1080p	35−40	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	4−5	8−9
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	10−11	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 145% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	16−18	30−35
ultra / 1080p	12−14	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	65−70	120−130
medium / 1080p	27−30	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 103% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	27−30
QHD / 1440p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	30−35	70−75
medium / 1080p	16−18	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 143% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	55−60	100−110
medium / 768p	50−55	95−100
high / 1080p	14−16	40−45
ultra / 1080p	7−8	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	5−6	12−14
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	14−16	40−45
medium / 1080p	7−8	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 183% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	95−100	120−130
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	70−75
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	14−16	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 108% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	30−33	75−80
medium / 768p	18−20	45−50
high / 1080p	10−12	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	14−16
4K / 2160p	6−7	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 126% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	40−45
high / 768p	40−45	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than FirePro W600.

Full Specs

	FirePro W600	Quadro M2000
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Cape Verde	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	13 June 2012	8 April 2016
Pipelines	512	768
Core clock speed	750 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	24.00	55.82
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length	163 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA		5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	94 Mh/s	215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W600 vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares