FireStream 9250 vs Quadro M2000

In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and Quadro M2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FireStream 9250

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FireStream 9250	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR3	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

FireStream 9250 has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M2000 has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 171 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 4626 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	1−2	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	5−6	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	7−8	30−35
ultra / 1080p	5−6	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	18−20	65−70
medium / 1080p	7−8	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 355% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9250 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	230−240
medium / 768p	95−100	200−210
ultra / 1080p	45−50	120−130
QHD / 1440p	35−40	90−95
4K / 2160p	18−20	50−55
high / 768p	70−75	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	80−85	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	50−55	100−110
ultra / 1080p	27−30	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	3−4	24−27
ultra / 1080p	3−4	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
low / 720p	12−14	50−55
medium / 1080p	4−5	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 440% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	10−12	30−35
ultra / 1080p	6−7	24−27
QHD / 1440p	3−4	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	120−130
medium / 1080p	14−16	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 217% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	8−9	35−40
ultra / 1080p	6−7	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	20−22	70−75
medium / 1080p	10−11	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 309% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	50−55	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	8−9	40−45
ultra / 1080p	3−4	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 157% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	2−3	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	7−8	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
4K / 2160p	75−80	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	6−7	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	7−8	40−45
medium / 1080p	7−8	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	16−18	75−80
medium / 768p	12−14	45−50
high / 1080p	6−7	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 325% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	80−85	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FireStream 9250.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9250	Quadro M2000
Architecture	TeraScale	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	RV770	GM206
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	16 June 2008	8 April 2016
Pipelines	800	768
Core clock speed	625 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	25.00	55.82
Floating-point performance	1,000.0 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length		201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1986 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	63.55 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12
Shader Model	4.1	5
OpenGL	3.3	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA		5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
		Check Price

FireStream 9250 vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares