GRID K160Q vs Quadro M2000

When comparing GRID K160Q and Quadro M2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and Quadro M2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K160Q

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K160Q has 73% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M2000 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 54 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000.
GRID K160Q and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 4830 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	9−10	40−45
medium / 1080p	1−2	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 580% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	1−2	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	8−9	65−70
medium / 1080p	2−3	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K160Q and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	230−240
medium / 768p	75−80	200−210
ultra / 1080p	30−35	120−130
QHD / 1440p	−	90−95
4K / 2160p	9−10	50−55
high / 768p	50−55	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 187% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	120−130
medium / 768p	35−40	100−110
ultra / 1080p	14−16	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 160% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	6−7	50−55
medium / 1080p	1−2	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	120−130
medium / 1080p	3−4	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 326% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	10−12	70−75
medium / 1080p	3−4	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 714% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	0−1	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	1−2	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4100% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	75−80
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	2−3	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1600% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	40−45
high / 768p	27−30	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro M2000
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK107	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	8 April 2016
Pipelines	192	768
Core clock speed	850 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	55.82
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length		201 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares