GRID K240Q vs Quadro M2000

When choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro M2000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K240Q and Quadro M2000.

GRID K240Q

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K240Q	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K240Q has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M2000 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 51 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 1612 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	16−18	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	35−40	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	170−180	230−240
medium / 768p	140−150	200−210
ultra / 1080p	75−80	120−130
QHD / 1440p	40−45	90−95
4K / 2160p	30−33	50−55
high / 768p	110−120	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	95−100	120−130
medium / 768p	75−80	100−110
ultra / 1080p	45−50	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	4−5	8−9
low / 720p	27−30	50−55
medium / 1080p	12−14	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 92% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	75−80	120−130
medium / 1080p	35−40	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 70% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
QHD / 1440p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	35−40	70−75
medium / 1080p	21−24	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 105% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	65−70	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	95−100
high / 1080p	20−22	40−45
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	20−22	40−45
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 88% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 16% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	70−75
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	20−22	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	35−40	75−80
medium / 768p	24−27	45−50
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	8−9	14−16
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	40−45
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K240Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K240Q	Quadro M2000
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK104	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	8 April 2016
Pipelines	1536	768
Core clock speed	745 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	55.82
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length		201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
		Check Price

GRID K240Q vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares