GRID K280Q vs Quadro M2000

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K280Q and Quadro M2000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K280Q stacks up against Quadro M2000, check out specs charts below.

GRID K280Q

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K280Q	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K280Q has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID K280Q and Quadro M2000 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 51 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
GRID K280Q and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 1612 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	21−24
ultra / 1080p	7−8	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	24−27	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	30−35
ultra / 1080p	16−18	27−30
QHD / 1440p	2−3	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	180−190	230−240
medium / 768p	150−160	200−210
ultra / 1080p	80−85	120−130
QHD / 1440p	45−50	90−95
4K / 2160p	30−33	50−55
high / 768p	120−130	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	80−85	100−110
ultra / 1080p	50−55	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	8−9
low / 720p	30−35	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 68% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	85−90	120−130
medium / 1080p	40−45	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 53% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	20−22	35−40
ultra / 1080p	16−18	27−30
QHD / 1440p	6−7	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	70−75
medium / 1080p	21−24	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	65−70	95−100
high / 1080p	21−24	40−45
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 88% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	70−75
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	40−45	75−80
medium / 768p	27−30	45−50
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	14−16
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	40−45
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GRID K280Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K280Q	Quadro M2000
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK104	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	8 April 2016
Pipelines	1536	768
Core clock speed	745 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	55.82
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length		201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
		Check Price

GRID K280Q vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares