GRID K520 vs Quadro M2000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro M2000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K520 stacks up against Quadro M2000, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
Main Specs
GRID K520
Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID K520 and Quadro M2000 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 51 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
GRID K520 and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 66 mm longer, than Quadro M2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 1612 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
20−22
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
9−10
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
27−30
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 24% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
210−220
230−240
medium / 768p
180−190
200−210
ultra / 1080p
100−110
120−130
QHD / 1440p
55−60
90−95
4K / 2160p
30−35
50−55
high / 768p
140−150
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
100−110
ultra / 1080p
65−70
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
18−20
24−27
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
low / 720p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
120−130
medium / 1080p
55−60
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 17% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
10−11
14−16
4K / 2160p
10−11
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
80−85
95−100
high / 1080p
30−35
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
4−5
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
3−4
3−4
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
70−75
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
GRID K520 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
60−65
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
45−50
high / 1080p
20−22
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
4K / 2160p
8−9
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro M2000.
Full Specs
GRID K520
Quadro M2000
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
GK104
GM206
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
23 July 2013
8 April 2016
Pipelines
1536
768
Core clock speed
745 MHz
796 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
55.82
Floating-point performance
2x 2,448 gflops
1,812 gflops
Length
267 mm
201 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
+
CUDA
3.0
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
76 Mh/s
215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
