Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro M2000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M2000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 stacks up against Quadro M2000, check out specs charts below.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
eDRAM
128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M2000 has 66% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M2000 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 596 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 108% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
160−170
230−240
medium / 768p
130−140
200−210
ultra / 1080p
65−70
120−130
QHD / 1440p
35−40
90−95
4K / 2160p
27−30
50−55
high / 768p
100−110
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
70−75
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
10−12
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
50−55
medium / 1080p
12−14
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
120−130
medium / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 85% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
27−30
QHD / 1440p
3−4
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 129% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
95−100
high / 1080p
18−20
40−45
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 80% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
30−35
75−80
medium / 768p
21−24
45−50
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
4K / 2160p
7−8
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro M2000
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
Haswell GT3e
GM206
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
8 April 2016
Pipelines
40
768
Core clock speed
200 MHz
796 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1163 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
55.82
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
1,812 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6612 MHz
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
+
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
215 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
