Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro M2000
When comparing Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro M2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro M2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR4
128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M2000 - in Desktops.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
20−22
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
5−6
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
27−30
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 29% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
230−240
medium / 768p
180−190
200−210
ultra / 1080p
100−110
120−130
QHD / 1440p
55−60
90−95
4K / 2160p
30−33
50−55
high / 768p
140−150
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
100−110
ultra / 1080p
65−70
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
18−20
24−27
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
low / 720p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
20−22
24−27
QHD / 1440p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
120−130
medium / 1080p
55−60
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 22% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
9−10
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
80−85
95−100
high / 1080p
30−35
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
55−60
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
45−50
high / 1080p
20−22
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Quadro M2000
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
Tiger Lake Xe
GM206
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
15 August 2020
8 April 2016
Pipelines
96
768
Core clock speed
796 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
Transistor count
2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
55.82
Floating-point performance
1,812 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6612 MHz
Shared memory
+
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12
Shader Model
5
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
+
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
215 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
