NVS 810 vs Quadro M2000

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing NVS 810 and Quadro M2000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between NVS 810 and Quadro M2000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

NVS 810 Check Price

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M2000 has 10% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 106 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000.
NVS 810 and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M2000 is 3 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 4812 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	1−2	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	5−6	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	16−18	65−70
medium / 1080p	6−7	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 810 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	230−240
medium / 768p	95−100	200−210
ultra / 1080p	40−45	120−130
QHD / 1440p	21−24	90−95
4K / 2160p	16−18	50−55
high / 768p	65−70	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 137% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	45−50	100−110
ultra / 1080p	21−24	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 108% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	24−27
ultra / 1080p	2−3	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
low / 720p	10−12	50−55
medium / 1080p	4−5	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	120−130
medium / 1080p	10−12	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 237% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	5−6	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	3−4	14−16
4K / 2160p	2−3	12−14
low / 720p	18−20	70−75
medium / 1080p	8−9	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	4−5	40−45
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	4−5	40−45
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 33% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	6−7	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	10−11	75−80
medium / 768p	8−9	45−50
high / 1080p	4−5	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro M2000
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GM107	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 November 2015	8 April 2016
Pipelines	512	768
Core clock speed	902 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1163 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	33.06	55.82
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length	198 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	5.0	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares