Quadro K2000M vs Quadro M2000
In this comparison between Quadro K2000M and Quadro M2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M
Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M2000 has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro M2000 - in Desktops.
Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 51 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 4812 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
21−24
ultra / 1080p
0−1
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
3−4
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
30−35
ultra / 1080p
4−5
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
16−18
65−70
medium / 1080p
5−6
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
−
Quadro K2000M and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
230−240
medium / 768p
90−95
200−210
ultra / 1080p
40−45
120−130
QHD / 1440p
21−24
90−95
4K / 2160p
18−20
50−55
high / 768p
65−70
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 140% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
2−3
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
10−12
50−55
medium / 1080p
3−4
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
30−35
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
QHD / 1440p
2−3
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
120−130
medium / 1080p
10−12
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 237% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
16−18
70−75
medium / 1080p
8−9
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
40−45
100−110
medium / 768p
−
95−100
high / 1080p
5−6
40−45
ultra / 1080p
2−3
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
1−2
12−14
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
5−6
40−45
medium / 1080p
3−4
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 30% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
6−7
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
12−14
75−80
medium / 768p
8−9
45−50
high / 1080p
4−5
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 485% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
40−45
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M
Quadro M2000
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
N14P-Q3
GM206
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
8 April 2016
Pipelines
384
768
Core clock speed
745 MHz
796 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
23.84
55.82
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
1,812 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
+
CUDA
+
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
215 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price