Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M2000 and Radeon R5 430 OEM, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M2000 stacks up against Radeon R5 430 OEM, check out specs charts below.

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Radeon R5 430 OEM

Main Specs

	Quadro M2000	Radeon R5 430 OEM
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price

Quadro M2000 has 50% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Quadro M2000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro M2000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 66 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 2012 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	1−2
ultra / 1080p	12−14	0−1
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	40−45	12−14
medium / 1080p	24−27	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p	30−35	−
ultra / 1080p	27−30	4−5
QHD / 1440p	12−14	0−1
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	65−70	14−16
medium / 1080p	35−40	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 1080p	−	50−55
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	100−110
medium / 768p	200−210	80−85
ultra / 1080p	120−130	40−45
QHD / 1440p	90−95	21−24
4K / 2160p	50−55	18−20
high / 768p	170−180	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	50−55	16−18
medium / 1080p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p	120−130	70−75
medium / 768p	100−110	45−50
ultra / 1080p	80−85	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p	24−27	2−3
ultra / 1080p	21−24	2−3
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	10−12
medium / 1080p	27−30	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p	30−35	10−11
ultra / 1080p	24−27	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	3−4
low / 720p	120−130	45−50
medium / 1080p	70−75	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 260% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p	35−40	5−6
ultra / 1080p	27−30	5−6
QHD / 1440p	14−16	0−1
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	70−75	16−18
medium / 1080p	40−45	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 462% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p	100−110	40−45
medium / 768p	95−100	35−40
high / 1080p	40−45	5−6
ultra / 1080p	16−18	3−4
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 195% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p	12−14	1−2
ultra / 1080p	10−11	0−1
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	5−6
medium / 1080p	18−20	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p	120−130	80−85
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	−	65−70
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 52% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	70−75	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	4−5
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	40−45	5−6
medium / 1080p	21−24	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p	75−80	12−14
medium / 768p	45−50	9−10
high / 1080p	24−27	5−6
ultra / 1080p	14−16	3−4
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 485% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	40−45	12−14
high / 768p	55−60	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.

Full Specs

	Quadro M2000	Radeon R5 430 OEM
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	GM206	Oland
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	8 April 2016	30 June 2016
Pipelines	768	384
Core clock speed	796 MHz	730 MHz
Boost Clock	1163 MHz	780 MHz
Transistor count	2,940 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	55.82	18.72
Floating-point performance	1,812 gflops	599.0 gflops
Length	201 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	4600 MHz
Memory bandwidth		36.8 GB/s
DirectX	12	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays	4
nView Desktop Management	+
	Check Price

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares