Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R7 250
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M2000 and Radeon R7 250, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M2000 stacks up against Radeon R7 250, check out specs charts below.
Main Specs
Quadro M2000
Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
N/A
Memory type
128 Bit
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
Quadro M2000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 250.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro M2000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M2000 is 33 mm longer, than Radeon R7 250.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 5462 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
3−4
ultra / 1080p
12−14
1−2
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
14−16
medium / 1080p
24−27
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
30−35
6−7
ultra / 1080p
27−30
4−5
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
65−70
18−20
medium / 1080p
35−40
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 355% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R7 250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
120−130
medium / 768p
200−210
90−95
ultra / 1080p
120−130
45−50
QHD / 1440p
90−95
24−27
4K / 2160p
50−55
−
high / 768p
170−180
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 133% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
120−130
80−85
medium / 768p
100−110
55−60
ultra / 1080p
80−85
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
24−27
4−5
ultra / 1080p
21−24
4−5
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
2−3
low / 720p
50−55
14−16
medium / 1080p
27−30
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
30−35
10−12
ultra / 1080p
24−27
7−8
QHD / 1440p
16−18
1−2
low / 720p
120−130
50−55
medium / 1080p
70−75
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 217% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
35−40
8−9
ultra / 1080p
27−30
7−8
QHD / 1440p
14−16
3−4
4K / 2160p
12−14
3−4
low / 720p
70−75
21−24
medium / 1080p
40−45
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 277% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
100−110
45−50
medium / 768p
95−100
35−40
high / 1080p
40−45
8−9
ultra / 1080p
16−18
4−5
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 170% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
12−14
2−3
ultra / 1080p
10−11
1−2
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
9−10
medium / 1080p
18−20
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
120−130
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 35% more, than Radeon R7 250.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
70−75
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
16−18
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−11
3−4
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
40−45
7−8
medium / 1080p
21−24
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
75−80
18−20
medium / 768p
45−50
12−14
high / 1080p
24−27
6−7
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 310% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
40−45
16−18
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon R7 250.
Full Specs
Quadro M2000
Radeon R7 250
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN
Code name
GM206
Oland XT
Type
Workstation
Desktop
Release date
8 April 2016
1 October 2013
Pipelines
768
384
Core clock speed
796 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
2,940 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
55.82
25.20
Floating-point performance
1,812 gflops
716.8 gflops
Length
201 mm
168 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6612 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12
Shader Model
5
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
+
CUDA
5.2
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
215 Mh/s
117 Mh/s
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price