Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 270X

In this comparison between Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Radeon R9 270X Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270X
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	180 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	2 x 6-pin
Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R9 270X has 140% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 270X.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro M2000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 270X - with GCN.
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	6−7	10−11
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	24−27	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	30−35	40−45
ultra / 1080p	27−30	30−35
QHD / 1440p	12−14	18−20
4K / 2160p	8−9	10−12
low / 720p	65−70	80−85
medium / 1080p	35−40	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	240−250
medium / 768p	200−210	210−220
ultra / 1080p	120−130	140−150
QHD / 1440p	90−95	110−120
4K / 2160p	50−55	60−65
high / 768p	170−180	180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 270X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	21−24	27−30
QHD / 1440p	18−20	21−24
4K / 2160p	8−9	10−11
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	30−35	40−45
ultra / 1080p	24−27	30−35
QHD / 1440p	16−18	18−20
low / 720p	120−130	140−150
medium / 1080p	70−75	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	35−40	40−45
ultra / 1080p	27−30	30−35
QHD / 1440p	14−16	18−20
4K / 2160p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	70−75	80−85
medium / 1080p	40−45	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 17% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	95−100	100−110
high / 1080p	40−45	50−55
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−11	12−14
QHD / 1440p	10−11	12−14
4K / 2160p	3−4	4−5
low / 720p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Metro Exodus is 18% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 270X have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	80−85
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	16−18	18−20
ultra / 1080p	10−11	12−14
QHD / 1440p	2−3	4−5
4K / 2160p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	45−50	55−60
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
4K / 2160p	8−9	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	45−50
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro M2000.

Full Specs

	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 270X
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN
Code name	GM206	Curacao XT
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	8 April 2016	8 October 2013
Pipelines	768	1280
Core clock speed	796 MHz
Boost Clock	1163 MHz	1050 MHz
Transistor count	2,940 million	2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	55.82	84.00
Floating-point performance	1,812 gflops	2,688 gflops
Length	201 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth		179.2 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	+
CUDA	5.2
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	215 Mh/s	318 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
TrueAudio		+
Design		reference
DisplayPort support		+
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		30 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)		163 Sol/s
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays	4
nView Desktop Management	+
AppAcceleration		+
LiquidVR		+
TressFX		+
UVD		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 270X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares