Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 A375
When comparing Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 A375, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 A375 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 A375
Main Specs
Quadro M2000
Radeon R9 A375
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
128 Bit
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro M2000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 104 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000.
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 6608 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
2−3
ultra / 1080p
12−14
1−2
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
12−14
medium / 1080p
24−27
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
27−30
5−6
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
65−70
16−18
medium / 1080p
35−40
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
120−130
medium / 768p
200−210
95−100
ultra / 1080p
120−130
40−45
QHD / 1440p
90−95
21−24
4K / 2160p
50−55
16−18
high / 768p
170−180
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 137% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p
60−65
65−70
ultra / 1080p
50−55
20−22
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p
120−130
75−80
medium / 768p
100−110
45−50
ultra / 1080p
80−85
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p
24−27
2−3
ultra / 1080p
21−24
2−3
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
2−3
low / 720p
50−55
10−12
medium / 1080p
27−30
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p
30−35
10−11
ultra / 1080p
24−27
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
120−130
50−55
medium / 1080p
70−75
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 237% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p
35−40
5−6
ultra / 1080p
27−30
−
QHD / 1440p
14−16
3−4
4K / 2160p
12−14
2−3
low / 720p
70−75
18−20
medium / 1080p
40−45
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p
100−110
45−50
medium / 768p
95−100
−
high / 1080p
40−45
4−5
ultra / 1080p
16−18
2−3
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p
12−14
2−3
ultra / 1080p
10−11
0−1
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
4−5
medium / 1080p
18−20
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
70−75
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
40−45
6−7
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p
75−80
10−11
medium / 768p
45−50
8−9
high / 1080p
24−27
4−5
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
40−45
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
Full Specs
Quadro M2000
Radeon R9 A375
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 1.0
Code name
GM206
Venus
Type
Workstation
Desktop
Release date
8 April 2016
no data
Pipelines
768
640
Core clock speed
796 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
925 MHz
Transistor count
2,940 million
1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
55.82
37.00
Floating-point performance
1,812 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6612 MHz
4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
+
1.2
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
