Quadro M2000 vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M2000 and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M2000 and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
Quadro M2000
Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
128 Bit
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
3 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Quadro M2000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M2000 has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro M2000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 222 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Quadro M2000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 47 mm longer, than Quadro M2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 3612 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
QHD / 1440p
12−14
8−9
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
65−70
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 14% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro M2000 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
220−230
medium / 768p
200−210
190−200
ultra / 1080p
120−130
110−120
QHD / 1440p
90−95
70−75
4K / 2160p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
170−180
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
80−85
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
20−22
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
low / 720p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
27−30
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
70−75
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p
35−40
30−35
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
10−12
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
medium / 768p
95−100
85−90
high / 1080p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
QHD / 1440p
7−8
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−12
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 13% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p
75−80
65−70
medium / 768p
45−50
40−45
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050.
Full Specs
Quadro M2000
Tesla C2050
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Fermi
Code name
GM206
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
8 April 2016
25 July 2011
Pipelines
768
448
Core clock speed
796 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
Transistor count
2,940 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
55.82
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,812 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
201 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
6612 MHz
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.0 GB/s
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
+
N/A
CUDA
5.2
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
215 Mh/s
90 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
