FirePro V5800 vs Quadro M2000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and Quadro M2000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against Quadro M2000M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro M2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 34% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 348 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 175% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 80% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 123% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 144% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 176% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro M2000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Juniper | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 43.92 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |