FirePro W4100 vs Quadro M2000M
When comparing FirePro W4100 and Quadro M2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4100 and Quadro M2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4100
Quadro M2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M2000M has 10% more power consumption, than FirePro W4100.
FirePro W4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4100.
FirePro W4100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 408 MHz higher, than FirePro W4100.
FirePro W4100 and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4100.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
130−140
220−230
medium / 768p
110−120
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
110−120
QHD / 1440p
30−33
70−75
4K / 2160p
27−30
40−45
high / 768p
80−85
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 67% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
110−120
medium / 1080p
21−24
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 114% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−12
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 153% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
50−55
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
85−90
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
24−27
65−70
medium / 768p
16−18
40−45
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 29% more, than FirePro W4100.
Full Specs
FirePro W4100
Quadro M2000M
Architecture
GCN
Maxwell
Code name
Cape Verde
GM107
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
2 October 2015
Pipelines
512
640
Core clock speed
630 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1197 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
20.16
43.92
Floating-point performance
645.1 gflops
1,405 gflops
Length
171 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
173 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Form factor
low profile / half length
Dual-link DVI support
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price