FireStream 9250 vs Quadro M2000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro M2000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9250 stacks up against Quadro M2000M, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9250
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Quadro M2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 413 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 90% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 380% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 188% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 245% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Quadro M2000M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
Code name | RV770 | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 43.92 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |