FireStream 9370 vs Quadro M2000M
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Quadro M2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 and Quadro M2000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 213 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 19% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 28% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 9% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Quadro M2000M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
Code name | Cypress | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 43.92 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |