GeForce 940A vs Quadro M2000M
In this comparison between GeForce 940A and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 940A will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 940A
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940A | Quadro M2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 940A and Quadro M2000M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 9 MHz higher, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 2998 MHz higher, than GeForce 940A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 30% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 90% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 257% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 163% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 266% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 187% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940A | Quadro M2000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM108 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1197 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 43.92 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |