GeForce 9800 GTX vs Quadro M2000M
When comparing GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro M2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro M2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 9800 GTX
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro M2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 154% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 650 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3900 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 514% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro M2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro M2000M | |
| Architecture | Tesla | Maxwell |
| Code name | G92 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 March 2008 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 128 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 43.92 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |