GeForce GTX 260 vs Quadro M2000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and Quadro M2000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 260 stacks up against Quadro M2000M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Quadro M2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 230% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 892 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 204 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 4001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
18−20
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
20−22
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
120−130
220−230
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
45−50
110−120
QHD / 1440p
24−27
70−75
4K / 2160p
−
40−45
high / 768p
70−75
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
27−30
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 245% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
9−10
35−40
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
65−70
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Quadro M2000M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Maxwell
Code name
GT200
GM107
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
16 June 2008
2 October 2015
Pipelines
192
640
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1197 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
43.92
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
1,405 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12
Shader Model
4.0
5.0
OpenGL
2.1
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.0
CUDA cores
192
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
173 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price