GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro M2000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro M2000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 280 stacks up against Quadro M2000M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 280
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro M2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 329% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 258 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3893 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 119% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 206% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 388% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 360% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro M2000M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GT200 | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 43.92 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |