GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Quadro M2000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro M2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Quadro M2000M.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro M2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 363 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Quadro M2000M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM107 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | no data | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |