GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro M2000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro M2000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 465 stacks up against Quadro M2000M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro M2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 263% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro M2000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 177 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3397 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
30−33
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
24−27
QHD / 1440p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
200−210
220−230
medium / 768p
170−180
190−200
ultra / 1080p
95−100
110−120
QHD / 1440p
50−55
70−75
4K / 2160p
30−33
40−45
high / 768p
130−140
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
95−100
110−120
medium / 1080p
50−55
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
10−12
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
80−85
95−100
medium / 768p
70−75
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro M2000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
50−55
65−70
medium / 768p
30−35
40−45
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro M2000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro M2000M
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Code name
GF100
GM107
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
31 May 2010
2 October 2015
Pipelines
352
640
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1197 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
43.92
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
1,405 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.2
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.0
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
173 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price