GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Quadro M2000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M2000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M2000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro M2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 143% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 58 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 4994 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
210−220
220−230
medium / 768p
180−190
190−200
ultra / 1080p
100−110
110−120
QHD / 1440p
60−65
70−75
4K / 2160p
30−35
40−45
high / 768p
150−160
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
70−75
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
18−20
20−22
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
110−120
medium / 1080p
60−65
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−11
10−12
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
80−85
85−90
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M2000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
65−70
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M2000M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro M2000M
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GK106
GM107
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
2 October 2015
Pipelines
768
640
Core clock speed
980 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1197 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
43.92
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
1,405 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.0
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
173 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price