GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Quadro M2000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Quadro M2000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Quadro M2000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Quadro M2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM has 209% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 123 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is 1008 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Quadro M2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Quadro M2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Fortnite is 77% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro M2000M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Quadro M2000M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK104 | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 September 2013 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1197 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 109.8 | 43.92 |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 156 Mh/s | 173 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |