GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro M2000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro M2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 55 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 410 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro M2000M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK106 | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1197 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 43.92 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |