Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro M2000M
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro M2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro M2000M.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro M2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro M2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 or Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro M2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M2000M has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 738 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
18−20
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
100−110
220−230
medium / 768p
80−85
190−200
ultra / 1080p
35−40
110−120
QHD / 1440p
24−27
70−75
4K / 2160p
−
40−45
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
110−120
medium / 1080p
12−14
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 190% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
40−45
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
85−90
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
2−3
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
7−8
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 228% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
16−18
65−70
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro M2000M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Maxwell
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GM107
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
10 July 2019
2 October 2015
Pipelines
48
640
Core clock speed
300 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1197 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
43.92
Floating-point performance
1,405 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Shader Model
6.4
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
173 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price